DA9062-00 vs DA9062-A0

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
tentner
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 2 days ago
Joined: 2018-12-07 09:36
DA9062-00 vs DA9062-A0

Hi,

in AN-PM-080 it says in the revision log "Replaced DA9062-00 with DA9062-A0". Is this -A0 the correct (new) part number? The quotation we got from our distributor reads -00. Can anybody bring some light into this?

Thanks,

Thomas

Device: 
ED_Dialog
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Staff
Joined: 2017-09-18 11:54
Hello Thomas,

Hello Thomas,

The -00 and the -A0 parts are the same parts. We made the change from the -00 to the -A0 for traceability reasons. This is a relatively new change, so it might take some time for the new PN to filter through. However, as I have mentioned, the parts are the same, so there should be no issues with programming the parts.

Will these parts be used for In-circuit programmed or for prototypes?

Kind regards,
Elliott Dexter

tentner
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 2 days ago
Joined: 2018-12-07 09:36
Hi Dexter,

Hi Dexter,

thanks. We plan to use ICP. Shall we use the -A0 name in our BOM?

Regards,

Thomas

ED_Dialog
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Staff
Joined: 2017-09-18 11:54
Hello Thomas,

Hello Thomas,

My suggestion would be to use the -A0.

 

Kind regards,
Elliott Dexter